After a springtime
of climbing and guiding in Alaska/Denali and an enjoyable stint back
in Mammut & my home-base state of Vermont, I arrived back in the
Pacific Northwest this past week for a series of Rainier climbs with
Rainier Mountaineering Incorporated (RMI). As chance would have it,
my climb was slotted to be the first climb of the summer
season—apparently though, nobody had shouted to the sky that it was
about to be summer. Or, if they had, the sky wasn't listening.
Practicing self-arrests during the training. |
We gathered on June 20th for an orientation down in Ashford, under leaden skies and happy to be under the thick canvas of the RMI Base Camp Bar&Grill tents as we looked through gear and went over climbing logistics. The next day was a training trip up and around the “Paradise” area of Mount Rainier National Park (~6000') and it definitely took some gumption to leave the warm shuttle van and step out into the misty, puddled parking lot. But you can't win if you don't play and in the world of mountaineering—and particularly in the world of “Northwet” mountaineering—often times if you just give it a go, the weather'll clear and you'll be able to get after the objective you came for. Such was the case both on our school day and then on the summit climb June 22-23rd.
After a day of
cats, dogs, and all other weather creatures during training, we
cruised up the Muir Snowfield on the 22nd under a sweet
sapphire blue sky, affording us views of Mt. St. Helens and a
cloud-capped Mt. Adams. We also had a stellar view of Mt. Rainier's
summit—which was good, because that'd be the last we'd see of it
before standing on it the next day. Over the course of the afternoon
the predicted low-pressure trough came in, “mares' tail” clouds
began to form, and our brief summer appetizer came to an end. Back
to spring...
Cruising up to Camp Muir under blue skies. |
Waking at 11:30pm
that same night, we looked outside to see what fate awaited us.
Things looked decent—much better than the milk bowl of no
visibility mist I'd encountered when going to take a pee an hour or
so before—so we roused the team and readied ourselves for whatever
lay ahead. By 1:00am we were en route. The current route is an
unusual one not climbed in about a decade, according to folks who've
been here that long. For a complete route report, check out the
report I posted on the Adventure Spirit Rock+Ice+Alpine website, but
the long and the short of it is that instead of heading up from the
top of Disappointment Cleaver it takes a hard turn toward Gibraltar
Ledges, traveling over a knife-edge ice rib and scaling a few
crevasse lips along the way.
Less than stellar summertime weather above Gibraltar Ledges. |
Conditions
deteriorated the higher we went and by the time we hit the summit we
knew it mainly because the ground leveled out. Though we were in the
proverbial “golf ball” conditions, it was nonetheless a moment of
great satisfaction for the entire team. Though the first climb of
the summer hardly felt like summer climbing, and though the summit
was less than warm and welcoming, the satisfaction of pushing through
in the face of adversity carried with it its own reward.
Of worth to note is a few new pieces
in my Rainier climbing kit. During this first summit climb I used
the Mammut Skywalker 2 Helmet and Togir Slide Harness. For many of
my early years in mountaineering and alpine climbing, I used
harnesses marketed more for that purpose. And I always felt they
were lacking. One popular model out there uses a double-back buckle
system that is hard to operate with warm hands and impossible
otherwise. Not to mention that no matter how oxygen-deprived your
high-altitude mind is, you have to remember to run the waist strap
through your belay loop before buckling it--or forget and then be
forced to re-buckle it, with even colder fingers. No such problems
with the Togir Slide—it's got a quick buckle system on the waist
and adjustable, quick buckle leg loops that make it easy to put over
boots even if they've got crampons on. Plus, it's got a low profile
that fits well under a pack. True, it does weigh a few ounces more
than most mountaineering specific harnesses, but the versatility and
features of the Togr Slide make it a solid choice as a harness
suitable for rock and alpine environments.
Descending the Cleaver under the safety of the Skywalker 2 |
The Skywalker 2 Helmet is also working
out well on Rainier. Much as I love Rainier, it's a choss-pile:
Whether we're talking ice blocks or lava chunks, Rainier constantly
reminds unwary climbers with reminders that gravity still works.
These are perfect places for hard shell plastic helmets. Though
molded EPS (“polystyrene”) helmets weigh a bit more that
polystyrene varieties (the Skywalker 2 weighs 380g versus Mammut's
250g Rock Rider polystyrene option), they are much more resilient to
impact from falling objects—a key feature during my Rainier climbs.
The Skywalker 2 has a dial adjustment system that was quick and easy
to tweak even with gloves on, as I transitioned between a ball cap
and ski cap in the variable conditions. The chin strap has comfy
padding and the carriage system is also quite comfy. All and all,
this helmet is a durable, stylish, and versatile way to protect your
noggin, whether at the crag or skirting crevasses at fourteen
thousand feet.
Though my recent climb on Rainier
didn't exactly prove the point, summer is indeed here. These long
and sweet days are fleeting, so make it a priority to make the most
of them and to take on fully all of the adventures that life
presents. Onward & upward!
2 comments:
Are helmets rated for any sort of impact? Say, able to resist a four pound chunk of falling rock or ice?
All Mammut climbing helmets are certified to a pair of European standards that measure a helmet's performance capabilities. In a real-life climb, you're most likely to sustain a hit on top of or at least halfway up the side of your helmet. This is why, in addition to testing for overhead impact, both the CE (European Committee for Standardization) and the UIAA (Union Internationale des Associations d'Alpinisme) also test for side impacts by tilting the helmet at a 60 degree angle.
What is the key difference between the 2 certifications? A UIAA-certified helmet meets a more stringent standard. Their EN 12492 standard requires that 20% less impact force get transmitted to the headform during lab testing than does CE certification using the same test method, so keep this in mind when comparing models.
Post a Comment